Difference between revisions of "Talk:Interlaboratory Comparisons"

From validwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎1. Introduction)
(→‎1. Introduction)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
In this talk, information from EN ISO/IEC 17043 are selected and reported.<br />
 
In this talk, information from EN ISO/IEC 17043 are selected and reported.<br />
 
An interlaboratory comparison consists of organization, performance and evaluation of measurements or tests on the same or similar items by two or more laboratories in accordance with predetermined conditions. <br />
 
An interlaboratory comparison consists of organization, performance and evaluation of measurements or tests on the same or similar items by two or more laboratories in accordance with predetermined conditions. <br />
−
The main goals of an interlaboratory comparison are:<br />
+
Among the main goals of an interlaboratory comparison are:<br />
 
1) evaluation of the performance of laboratories for specific tests or measurements;<br />
 
1) evaluation of the performance of laboratories for specific tests or measurements;<br />
 
2) monitoring laboratories' performance, identification of possible problems and initiation of actions for improvement;<br />
 
2) monitoring laboratories' performance, identification of possible problems and initiation of actions for improvement;<br />
Line 9: Line 9:
 
5) education of participating laboratories based on the outcomes of such comparisons;<br />
 
5) education of participating laboratories based on the outcomes of such comparisons;<br />
 
6) validation of uncertainty claims;<br />
 
6) validation of uncertainty claims;<br />
−
h) evaluation of the performance characteristics of a method – often described as collaborative trials;
+
7) evaluation of the performance characteristics of a method – often described as collaborative trials;<br />
−
i) assignment of values to reference materials and assessment of their suitability for use in specific test or
+
8) assignment of values to reference materials and assessment of their suitability for use in specific test or measurement procedures;<br />
−
measurement procedures; and
+
j) support for statements of the equivalence of measurements of National Metrology Institutes through “key comparisons” and supplementary comparisons conducted on behalf of the International Bureau of
−
j) support for statements of the equivalence of measurements of National Metrology Institutes through “key
+
Weights and Measurement (BIPM) and associated regional metrology organizations.<br />
−
comparisons” and supplementary comparisons conducted on behalf of the International Bureau of
+
 
−
Weights and Measurement (BIPM) and associated regional metrology organizations.
+
Proficiency testing involves the use of interlaboratory comparisons for the determination of laboratory performance.<br />
−
Proficiency testing involves the use of interlaboratory comparisons for the determination of laboratory
+
The need for ongoing confidence in laboratory performance is not only essential for laboratories and their customers but also for other interested parties, such as regulators, laboratory accreditation bodies and other organizations that specify requirements for laboratories.
−
performance, as listed in a) to g) above. Proficiency testing does not usually address h), i) and j) because
 
−
laboratory competence is assumed in these applications, but these applications can be used to provide
 
−
independent demonstrations of laboratory competence. The requirements of this International Standard can
 
−
be applied to many of the technical planning and operational activities for h), i) and j).
 
−
The need for ongoing confidence in laboratory performance is not only essential for laboratories and their
 
−
customers but also for other interested parties, such as regulators, laboratory accreditation bodies and other
 
−
organizations that specify requirements for laboratories. ISO/IEC 17011 requires accreditation bodies to take
 
−
account of laboratories' participation and performance in proficiency testing. There is a growing need for
 
−
proficiency testing for other conformity assessment activities, such as inspection or product certification. Most
 
−
of the requirements in this International Standard apply to those evolving areas, especially regarding
 
−
management, planning and design, personnel, assuring quality, confidentiality, and other aspects, as
 
−
appropriate.
 
−
This International Standard has been prepared to provide a consistent basis for all interested parties to
 
−
determine the competence of organizations that provide proficiency testing. In doing so it replaces both parts
 
−
of ISO/IEC Guide 43:1997. ISO/IEC Guide 43 included not only guidance on development and operation of
 
−
proficiency testing and selection and use of proficiency testing by laboratory accreditation bodies, but also
 
−
useful descriptions of typical types of proficiency testing. This International Standard has preserved and
 
−
updated the principles for the operation of proficiency testing described in ISO/IEC Guide 43 and has retained
 
−
in Annexes A to C information on typical types of proficiency testing schemes, guidance on appropriate
 
−
statistical methods, selection and use of proficiency testing schemes by laboratories, accreditation bodies,
 
−
regulatory bodies, and other interested parties.===
 
  
 
==2. Scope==
 
==2. Scope==

Revision as of 10:24, 15 January 2018

1. Introduction

In this talk, information from EN ISO/IEC 17043 are selected and reported.
An interlaboratory comparison consists of organization, performance and evaluation of measurements or tests on the same or similar items by two or more laboratories in accordance with predetermined conditions.
Among the main goals of an interlaboratory comparison are:
1) evaluation of the performance of laboratories for specific tests or measurements;
2) monitoring laboratories' performance, identification of possible problems and initiation of actions for improvement;
3) establishment of the effectiveness and comparability of test or measurement methods;
4) identification of interlaboratory differences;
5) education of participating laboratories based on the outcomes of such comparisons;
6) validation of uncertainty claims;
7) evaluation of the performance characteristics of a method – often described as collaborative trials;
8) assignment of values to reference materials and assessment of their suitability for use in specific test or measurement procedures;
j) support for statements of the equivalence of measurements of National Metrology Institutes through “key comparisons” and supplementary comparisons conducted on behalf of the International Bureau of Weights and Measurement (BIPM) and associated regional metrology organizations.

Proficiency testing involves the use of interlaboratory comparisons for the determination of laboratory performance.
The need for ongoing confidence in laboratory performance is not only essential for laboratories and their customers but also for other interested parties, such as regulators, laboratory accreditation bodies and other organizations that specify requirements for laboratories.

2. Scope

3. Normative references

4. Technical requirements

5. Management requirements

6. Types of proficiency testing schemes

7. Statistical methods for proficiency testing

8. Selection and use of proficiency testing

Retrieved from "http://www.validnmr.com/w/index.php?title=Talk:Interlaboratory_Comparisons&oldid=1560"